
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for In Henry&#039;s Wake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inhenryswake.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com</link>
	<description>Hannah Hill&#039;s blog on South Carolina politics &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Primary challengers: good for everyone but incumbent presidents? by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2012/02/primary-challengers-good-for-everyone-but-incumbent-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-8458</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=679#comment-8458</guid>
		<description>This will take a compete turnover of RNC leadership and philosophy. May God give us the courage to make it happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will take a compete turnover of RNC leadership and philosophy. May God give us the courage to make it happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Primary challengers: good for everyone but incumbent presidents? by Hannah Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2012/02/primary-challengers-good-for-everyone-but-incumbent-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-8454</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=679#comment-8454</guid>
		<description>You bet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Primary challengers: good for everyone but incumbent presidents? by Trent Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2012/02/primary-challengers-good-for-everyone-but-incumbent-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-8453</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=679#comment-8453</guid>
		<description>Here, here! Plus it makes for a great show :)

- Trent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, here! Plus it makes for a great show <img src='http://www.inhenryswake.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>- Trent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 reasons not to support Newt Gingrich (that nobody seems to be talking about) by Who I voted for in the SC primary (and why I&#8217;m mad as all get-out about it) &#124; In Henry&#039;s Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2012/01/7-reasons-not-to-support-newt-gingrich-that-nobody-seems-to-be-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-8451</link>
		<dc:creator>Who I voted for in the SC primary (and why I&#8217;m mad as all get-out about it) &#124; In Henry&#039;s Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=649#comment-8451</guid>
		<description>[...] can&#8217;t believe that a lot of Republicans are supporting him. So that leaves Gingrich and Paul. I wrote a blog post explaining why I don&#8217;t like Gingrich or think he&#8217;s the conservative that many seem to think he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t believe that a lot of Republicans are supporting him. So that leaves Gingrich and Paul. I wrote a blog post explaining why I don&#8217;t like Gingrich or think he&#8217;s the conservative that many seem to think he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 reasons not to support Newt Gingrich (that nobody seems to be talking about) by Hannah Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2012/01/7-reasons-not-to-support-newt-gingrich-that-nobody-seems-to-be-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-7845</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=649#comment-7845</guid>
		<description>Goodness! I hadn&#039;t heard that one. Scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness! I hadn&#8217;t heard that one. Scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 reasons not to support Newt Gingrich (that nobody seems to be talking about) by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2012/01/7-reasons-not-to-support-newt-gingrich-that-nobody-seems-to-be-talking-about/comment-page-1/#comment-7842</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=649#comment-7842</guid>
		<description>Amen, sister! We have got to get away from the mentality of whoever sounds the best. Gingrich says some things that really worry me, too, including that the Patriot Act isn&#039;t strong enough. Seriously? He sure likes his shock factor is all I can say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, sister! We have got to get away from the mentality of whoever sounds the best. Gingrich says some things that really worry me, too, including that the Patriot Act isn&#8217;t strong enough. Seriously? He sure likes his shock factor is all I can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservative Infatuation: a disturbing tendency by 7 reasons not to support Newt Gingrich (that nobody seems to be talking about) &#124; In Henry&#039;s Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2010/07/conservative-infatuation-a-disturbing-tendency/comment-page-1/#comment-7837</link>
		<dc:creator>7 reasons not to support Newt Gingrich (that nobody seems to be talking about) &#124; In Henry&#039;s Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=245#comment-7837</guid>
		<description>[...] his record. Isn&#8217;t this what the naive liberals did with Obama? We need to be careful to avoid falling for the same thing ourselves. Share this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his record. Isn&#8217;t this what the naive liberals did with Obama? We need to be careful to avoid falling for the same thing ourselves. Share this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your vote: a sacred trust by An endorsement: a favor to exchange or a good name to guard? &#124; In Henry&#039;s Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2010/06/217/comment-page-1/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>An endorsement: a favor to exchange or a good name to guard? &#124; In Henry&#039;s Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=217#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>[...] it right to put your name behind a candidate &#8211; as a good faith pledge that you think this is the best candidate - when you actually don&#8217;t? Is it right to the public to assure them that Mitt Romney is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it right to put your name behind a candidate &#8211; as a good faith pledge that you think this is the best candidate - when you actually don&#8217;t? Is it right to the public to assure them that Mitt Romney is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church: A Regiment Gone AWOL by Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2011/07/the-church-a-regiment-gone-awol/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=597#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>@Joshua - thanks so much!

@Wesley - I think a true Christian will be a true patriot as well. It&#039;s very commendable to love your homeland. What we&#039;re seeing is a nation full of people who have forgotten how to be patriots or Christians, so they fake it as best they can.

@Jon David - interesting question. I think you&#039;d really see the government running scared, and it might get kind of ugly for a while. However, if enough pastors stood firm, any efforts of the government and the IRS to stamp it out would only fan the flames.

@Tim - you&#039;re exactly right. We&#039;re commanded to be salt and light in every area of life and society. Good point about the abolition movement, and I&#039;m intrigued by your mentioning the suffrage movement. Must check that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joshua &#8211; thanks so much!</p>
<p>@Wesley &#8211; I think a true Christian will be a true patriot as well. It&#8217;s very commendable to love your homeland. What we&#8217;re seeing is a nation full of people who have forgotten how to be patriots or Christians, so they fake it as best they can.</p>
<p>@Jon David &#8211; interesting question. I think you&#8217;d really see the government running scared, and it might get kind of ugly for a while. However, if enough pastors stood firm, any efforts of the government and the IRS to stamp it out would only fan the flames.</p>
<p>@Tim &#8211; you&#8217;re exactly right. We&#8217;re commanded to be salt and light in every area of life and society. Good point about the abolition movement, and I&#8217;m intrigued by your mentioning the suffrage movement. Must check that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Church: A Regiment Gone AWOL by Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.inhenryswake.com/2011/07/the-church-a-regiment-gone-awol/comment-page-1/#comment-4580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inhenryswake.com/?p=597#comment-4580</guid>
		<description>VERY well put! If the church had not been so vocal on politics and governance, we would not have had the fervor for the American Revolution, or for women&#039;s suffrage, or the abolition of slavery in the US. 

The church and Christians need to raise their voice for good and for righteousness, even in the political arena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VERY well put! If the church had not been so vocal on politics and governance, we would not have had the fervor for the American Revolution, or for women&#8217;s suffrage, or the abolition of slavery in the US. </p>
<p>The church and Christians need to raise their voice for good and for righteousness, even in the political arena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

